New members

This is an open forum to discuss all things that just might be on your mind.

Moderators: Post Moderators, Cheers Moderator

Post Reply
dhempy
Posts: 2357
Joined: Mon May 09, 2005 4:10 pm
Location: Santa Rosa Valley, CA

Re: New members

Post by dhempy »

+1 for what Brent posted ... if it is tasting good, that is a great sign. Waiting until Sunday surely won't hurt ...

Maybe someone else can chime in here ... would the flavor be noticeably different between an FG of 1.022 versus 1.016 in a Cream Stout (.006 points)? I would think it would be discernible in a lighter beer like a lager but I'm not so sure about a stout ... what do our distinguished BJCP judges think?

Dan
User avatar
tikitatt
Posts: 150
Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2010 4:07 pm

Re: New members

Post by tikitatt »

This is Eric’s AHP Sweet Stout recipe I used:

Beer Profile
Est Original Gravity: 1.054 SG
Est Final Gravity: 1.014 SG
Est Alcohol by Vol: 5.25%
Bitterness: 38.1 IBU
Est Color: 36.7 SRM
Measured original Gravity: 1.010 SG
Measured Final Gravity: 1.005 SG
Actual Alcohol by Vol: 0.65%
Calories: 43 cal/pint
brahn wrote:You might be at your final gravity (FG) at this point, checking it again on Sunday sounds like a good plan. You might also want to calibrate your hydrometer, they're often off by a few points. There are instructions here:

http://www.ehow.com/how_4926408_calibra ... meter.html

The original gravity of the wort has a big impact on the FG. Do you know the recipe you used for this batch? I don't remember seeing it in the thread. Since it's extract if you can post the recipe we can probably get a good estimate of what the OG was and that would give us a better idea of what FG to expect.
User avatar
brahn
Site Admin
Posts: 1799
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 5:12 pm
Location: Tustin, CA
Contact:

Re: New members

Post by brahn »

dhempy wrote:+1 for what Brent posted ... if it is tasting good, that is a great sign. Waiting until Sunday surely won't hurt ...

Maybe someone else can chime in here ... would the flavor be noticeably different between an FG of 1.022 versus 1.016 in a Cream Stout (.006 points)? I would think it would be discernible in a lighter beer like a lager but I'm not so sure about a stout ... what do our distinguished BJCP judges think?

Dan
I'm not too sure about this, but my hunch is that it's probably more closely related to attenuation than the absolute difference of .006. So if this were a RIS with an OG of 1.090 you may not notice a difference, but with an OG of 1.054 it's probably more noticeable.

Still, this is a sweet finishing style. If you're going to get lower than expected attenuation, this is probably a good style for it.

That .006 is also why I suggested calibrating the hydrometer, if it's off by .004 or so he could already be at a very normal FG for an extract based sweet stout.
User avatar
tikitatt
Posts: 150
Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2010 4:07 pm

Re: New members

Post by tikitatt »

Is it ok to open the carboy up again to get another sample in order to do the Ehow testing?

Thank you,
John

tikitatt wrote:This is Eric’s AHP Sweet Stout recipe I used:

Beer Profile
Est Original Gravity: 1.054 SG
Est Final Gravity: 1.014 SG
Est Alcohol by Vol: 5.25%
Bitterness: 38.1 IBU
Est Color: 36.7 SRM
Measured original Gravity: 1.010 SG
Measured Final Gravity: 1.005 SG
Actual Alcohol by Vol: 0.65%
Calories: 43 cal/pint
brahn wrote:You might be at your final gravity (FG) at this point, checking it again on Sunday sounds like a good plan. You might also want to calibrate your hydrometer, they're often off by a few points. There are instructions here:

http://www.ehow.com/how_4926408_calibra ... meter.html

The original gravity of the wort has a big impact on the FG. Do you know the recipe you used for this batch? I don't remember seeing it in the thread. Since it's extract if you can post the recipe we can probably get a good estimate of what the OG was and that would give us a better idea of what FG to expect.
User avatar
brahn
Site Admin
Posts: 1799
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 5:12 pm
Location: Tustin, CA
Contact:

Re: New members

Post by brahn »

You don't need to. You just need to do the test with water and then adjust the reading you already took from the carboy.
User avatar
tikitatt
Posts: 150
Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2010 4:07 pm

Re: New members

Post by tikitatt »

brahn,

Thanks for the heads up. I'm going to get started on that now.

John
brahn wrote:You don't need to. You just need to do the test with water and then adjust the reading you already took from the carboy.
User avatar
tikitatt
Posts: 150
Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2010 4:07 pm

Re: New members

Post by tikitatt »

I just tested my batch and the levels are the same. It was difficult taking a sample and think that may have something to do with it. I may have clogged my siphon and got too much grain in my sample. Is this normal?
User avatar
jward
Posts: 2103
Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2005 10:22 pm
Location: Irvine, CA
Contact:

Re: New members

Post by jward »

I'm confused. What would you be siphoning that has grain in it?
Image
User avatar
tikitatt
Posts: 150
Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2010 4:07 pm

Re: New members

Post by tikitatt »

Sorry, I was taking a sample of my cream stout to see if it's ready to bottle today and had a difficult time doing so. My siphoned was clogged from taking a sample from the bottle of the carboy which I hope is the reason my alcohol, gravity and sugar levels read the same as my reading from last week. Am I doing something wrong? Should I take my next sample higher up in the carboy?
jward wrote:I'm confused. What would you be siphoning that has grain in it?
User avatar
maltbarley
Posts: 2408
Joined: Thu Dec 08, 2005 9:31 am
Location: Orange, CA

Re: New members

Post by maltbarley »

tikitatt wrote:Am I doing something wrong? Should I take my next sample higher up in the carboy?
Yes, you want to keep your racking cane above the trub. The trub (pronounced "troob"), which contains hop matter grain dust and spent yeast, settles to the bottom of the carboy. You always want to leave this behind.
User avatar
jward
Posts: 2103
Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2005 10:22 pm
Location: Irvine, CA
Contact:

Re: New members

Post by jward »

maltbarley wrote:
tikitatt wrote:Am I doing something wrong? Should I take my next sample higher up in the carboy?
Yes, you want to keep your racking cane above the trub. The trub (pronounced "troob"), which contains hop matter grain dust and spent yeast, settles to the bottom of the carboy. You always want to leave this behind.
And break material. :wink:
Image
User avatar
tikitatt
Posts: 150
Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2010 4:07 pm

Re: New members

Post by tikitatt »

OK, I properly siphoned the beer out and the hydrometer reads as:

3% alcohol
6 Gravity
1.022 Sugar

Not much of an improvement but where I have been keeping the carboy keeps a temperature of around 60 to 62 degrees. The flavor is still passable for a first time brewing however if I were at the Goat Hill Tavern I would most likely take it back.

Thanks
jward wrote:
maltbarley wrote:
tikitatt wrote:Am I doing something wrong? Should I take my next sample higher up in the carboy?
Yes, you want to keep your racking cane above the trub. The trub (pronounced "troob"), which contains hop matter grain dust and spent yeast, settles to the bottom of the carboy. You always want to leave this behind.
And break material. :wink:
User avatar
brahn
Site Admin
Posts: 1799
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 5:12 pm
Location: Tustin, CA
Contact:

Re: New members

Post by brahn »

Well, 58% apparent attenuation is definitely on the low side, but if it hasn't changed from Wed to Sunday then it's probably gone as far as it's going to. I'd say it's time to bottle. Oh, and for future reference you can just post the gravity (the 1.022 number). Pro brewers will use Plato, but homebrewers generally use the SG system. I have no idea who uses the potential alcohol scale...

Did you end up calibrating your hydrometer? Did it read 1.000 in water?
User avatar
tikitatt
Posts: 150
Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2010 4:07 pm

Re: New members

Post by tikitatt »

Great, I will get started on sanitizing my bottles, etc. I'm still learning and to be honest I really have idea what I'm saying yet. I'll get there though. I did calibrate my hydrometer and it did read 1.000 in the water.
brahn wrote:Well, 58% apparent attenuation is definitely on the low side, but if it hasn't changed from Wed to Sunday then it's probably gone as far as it's going to. I'd say it's time to bottle. Oh, and for future reference you can just post the gravity (the 1.022 number). Pro brewers will use Plato, but homebrewers generally use the SG system. I have no idea who uses the potential alcohol scale...

Did you end up calibrating your hydrometer? Did it read 1.000 in water?
dhempy
Posts: 2357
Joined: Mon May 09, 2005 4:10 pm
Location: Santa Rosa Valley, CA

Re: New members

Post by dhempy »

+ 1 for what the others have said.

I wouldn't "sanitize" the bottles until right before you bottle ... go ahead and get them clean but sanitizing is an early part of the bottling process. Be sure to have your corn sugar (or other "priming agent"), caps, and enough bottles (plus 10 extras just in case .. ask me how I know!) and equipment lined up before you start. Do you have any questions on what you need to bottle or the process?

One thing to consider if you don't already have one is a bottling wand as it helps get the head space correct and has a valve at the bottom that stop flow when you're changing bottles. It works well with a siphon or with a CO2 "push".

If you like the taste, then don't worry about the specifics just yet. Also, try to get the bottles into the 70 degree range for carbonating. I let mine sit for 3 weeks and then 3 days in the fridge. The 3 days in the fridge is to allow for as much CO2 absorption as possible ... CO2 absorption is inversely related to temperature ... 3 and 3 are overkill for sure but patients is a brewing necessity ... wait until you start brewing lagers! I'm not sure what the recommended times are any longer (I've done 3 and 3 for a long time) ... 2 weeks probably for fermenting and just cold for chilling. You can sample along the way if you choose 2 weeks, 3 weeks, etc. ... a stout will age well ... set a bottle or two away for 6 months and see if you can tell the difference.


Dan
Post Reply